Aug. 31st, 2025

I am a unionized federal employee, and a citizen who does not much approve of unions for government employees. I have, since shortly after I began work at the Patent Office, chosen to be a dues-paying member of the Patent Office Professional Association. When, many years ago, I was investigated on suspicion of posting things I shouldn’t have, and/or possibly doing other improper things, POPA provided a representative to accompany at my hearing. Some other USPTO employees are represented by the National Treasury Employees Union. This is background. On Thursday, I received an email from the Acting Director of the USPTO, saying in part:

The administration has determined that the Patents business unit the Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) have “as a primary function … national security work,” and that the federal labor statute cannot be applied to Patents and OCIO “in a manner consistent with national security requirements and consideration.” As a result, employees in Patents and OCIO are no longer represented by unions (POPA and NTEU 243). These changes are effective immediately, and do not effect employees in other business units.

The executive orders do not effect any employee’s duty station, salary, health and retirement benefits, work hours, award programs, or the like.


On Friday, I received an email from the president of POPA, saying that this would probably be the last email she could send through the USPTO email system, and also that POPA would fight, and we could check out its website for further information, and to make donations.

Whether or not you think that civil service unions should exist, Trump’s executive orders seem bogus. We are not the CIA or the Marine Corps, and POPA has been representing examiners for many decades, under Democratic and Republican presidents, without anyone finding Union representation inconsistent with national security requirements. So I think that this is as much an unlawful power grab as the current administration’s claim that the President can impose tariffs by decree, on the basis of a statute that does not mention tariffs.

Profile

ndrosen

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 1234 5 6
789 10 1112 13
141516 1718 1920
21222324 2526 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 04:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios