The January issue of Commentary includes a book review, “Lonely in Space,” by David Guaspari, reviewing The Impossible Man: Roger Penrose and the Cost of Genius, a book by Patchen Barss. Professor Penrose is portrayed as super-intelligent, but not a good family man, and lacking in social skills. Guaspari quotes Barss quoting a collaborator of Penrose as contrasting being a human genius with being Penrose, whose insights “seem to stem from some superhuman life form.”

I may be qualified to comment on this in a small way, as I once had dinner with Sir Roger, and then ran into him a few months later, at which point we exchanged a few words. (He spent, and may still spend, part of his at Penn State, where my father used to be a professor of philosophy, and I was at that time a graduate student in materials; my parents were having the great man over for dinner, and invited me.) I don’t recall my interactions with him in detail, but I do recall him speaking to me politely, and I don’t remember him being paralyzed and unable to communicate. He may not be very good at dealing with regular people, especially female people, but as a super-nerd, he got along smoothly enough with a regular nerd. If he has made a mess of his family life, the same can be said of plenty of people of ordinary or below average intelligence.
With Florida legislating against exposing children to drag performances, would it now be illegal to allow any minors in the audience at a production of Shakespeare’s As You Like It? If the producer does what would usually be done these days, and employs an actress to play Rosalind, it seems that her presence on stage disguised as Ganymede would be an unacceptable instance of drag. If the producer did what would have been done in Shakespeare’s time, and used beardless youths to play the female roles, a boy’s appearance as Rosalind would be drag. In the latter case, the juveniles playing girls would not be allowed to see each other on stage.

This doesn’t even make the short list of primary reasons not to be pleased with Ron DeSantis.
There is an interesting article in Reason arguing that more individualism in a culture means more altruism; this is especially worthy of note when both Democrats and national greatness conservatives are seeking to expand government, dictate people’s choices, and make aid for the allegedly needy a matter of government programs, not human kindness.
Lately, we’ve been hearing idiocies along the lines of “You aren’t allowed to wear a sombrero if you aren’t Mexican, you’re not allowed to do yoga if you aren’t Indian, you aren’t allowed to drink miso soup if you aren’t Japanese, etc.”

Before yapping about cultural appropriation by progressive crybullies became a thing, I read a letter in the Washington Post by a grand pooh-bah of the Council of Conservative Citizens, formerly the White Citizens’ Council, responding to the paper’s coverage of his organization. He asserted that Western culture was the product of whites (for the most part true), and could only meaningfully be carried on by whites (horsefeathers). I remember wishing I could meet him, and tell him that “race” is not the same thing as culture, and that blacks whose ancestors spoke African languages, or yellow-skinned immigrants from East Asia and their descendants, could write worthy books in English, make contributions to physics, a science, in modern times, developed by white Europeans from Buridan through Newton and Einstein, etc.

The White Citizens’ Council no longer dominates Dixie, thank goodness, but the inane ideas of this remnant Southern gentleman have infected people who would claim to be woke anti-racists; this is not the first time that bad old ideas have been repackaged as the bright, progressive thing. I especially reject and abhominate the doctrine that an author cannot write about people of a culture other than her own. If she attempts to do so and gets it wrong, portraying foreigners or fellow countrymen from a different walk of life doing things they would be unlikely to do, and thinking thoughts which they would not plausibly think, she can legitimately be criticized for that, but the whole notion that it is wrong to step outside one’s own narrow bounds and commit “cultural appropriation” should be laughed out of respectable society.

Profile

ndrosen

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
456 78 9 10
11 1213141516 17
18 19 20 2122 23 24
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 05:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios