Reality Isn’t Optional
Jun. 11th, 2020 02:16 amThe woke are piling on JK Rowling for tweeting, “‘People who menstruate,’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?” This supposedly shows disrespect for those with different gender identities.
Monica Hesse had a column in Tuesday’s Washington Post, and then Molly Roberts’s column Wednesday scolded JKR for treating gender as binary. The horror!
I realize that some people actually have non-standard chromosomal arrangements and/or plumbing, and I’m not out to persecute them. Other people are not happy with the sex they are; well, we all have our personal problems. Nonetheless, on some matters, reality isn’t optional, and however someone may feel about her “gender identity” (remember when “gender” was a grammatical term?), if she has a uterus and menstruates, she’s a biological woman, or possibly, in a few cases, an intersex person with at least partial male and female reproductive organs.
If I were to “identify” as a woman, or as non-binary or two-spirit, I would still have my male organs, and would not menstruate. If you menstruate, ma’am, you’re a woman. I do not demand that you like it, and I will not attempt to stop you from getting surgery and hormone treatments, if you feel strongly enough about the matter. Short of going through with major surgery, you’re still a woman, and whether you would still be one afterward is a genuinely tricky question where things get non-binary. Meanwhile, physical and biological reality do not cease to exist because of your wishes or your personal frustrations.
Here’s to JKR and trans-exclusionary radical feminism!
Monica Hesse had a column in Tuesday’s Washington Post, and then Molly Roberts’s column Wednesday scolded JKR for treating gender as binary. The horror!
I realize that some people actually have non-standard chromosomal arrangements and/or plumbing, and I’m not out to persecute them. Other people are not happy with the sex they are; well, we all have our personal problems. Nonetheless, on some matters, reality isn’t optional, and however someone may feel about her “gender identity” (remember when “gender” was a grammatical term?), if she has a uterus and menstruates, she’s a biological woman, or possibly, in a few cases, an intersex person with at least partial male and female reproductive organs.
If I were to “identify” as a woman, or as non-binary or two-spirit, I would still have my male organs, and would not menstruate. If you menstruate, ma’am, you’re a woman. I do not demand that you like it, and I will not attempt to stop you from getting surgery and hormone treatments, if you feel strongly enough about the matter. Short of going through with major surgery, you’re still a woman, and whether you would still be one afterward is a genuinely tricky question where things get non-binary. Meanwhile, physical and biological reality do not cease to exist because of your wishes or your personal frustrations.
Here’s to JKR and trans-exclusionary radical feminism!
no subject
Date: 2020-06-11 07:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-11 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 10:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-07-03 06:15 pm (UTC)I also read some of the comments on the article, and think that they made reasonable points, too. One of them contained a link to an article about a number of sexual assaults committed in British gaols by transwomen sent to women’s prisons. For the record, I do not believe that all “trans” people are rapists, or want to become rapists, but I do point out that there are problems with treating people as being the sex they claim to identify as, rather than the sex they biologically are.
no subject
Date: 2020-06-11 01:24 pm (UTC)One whose body menstruates and two whose do not.
One who states they have both genitalia (and no, I'm not going to insist on looking myself--even I am not that crass).
This idea that human sexual biology is binary is contradicted by genetic and physical science.
Gender, on the other hand, is a social construct.
The social construct of female in Western society boils down to "worthlessness except for male benefit."
If it's down to simply "not liking" one's socially constructed gender, I would be male. I'm not. I know my self is female--just as I know that our current social construction of female is, as my father would call it, "a shit sandwich you have to eat with a smile."
Don't fall for the false dichotomies.
Sexual biology and biochemical gender are far more complex than mainstream America is comfortable with.
no subject
Date: 2020-06-11 02:17 pm (UTC)To the extent that socially constructed femininity in our society really is a s*** sandwich that you have to eat with a smile, you have my sympathies.